archaeology career , the good, the bad an the ugly...

Hi everyone!
In this post I will talk about to the changes I would like to apply in my career. I always think that the archaeological career in this University is a bit strange. To be honest, I have many complaints about to subject, teaching methods and the curriculum. Firstly,  archaeology in this University is just a mention the anthropology career. In much others University or others country, archaeology it’s a career and it was associated to history section, and not to anthropologhy. I could not say if this is good or bad, but it is a bit confusing. especially if you consider that the first two years is a mixture of three very different areas, social anthropology, physical anthropology and archeology

Every semester we have scientific, mathematical, social and philosophical topics. I do not think it is bad to know more, the problem is that it is very difficult to handle so much information, which requires very different skills, when you just start to know the career. In addition, the subjects of the archaeological specialty are basically data storage, which is exhausting and useless. In addition, there are very few practical activities, field trips and laboratory use. The career is basically hours and hours of theoretical classes.In addition, the subjects of the archaeological specialty are basically data storage, which is exhausting and useless. finally, one of the big problems of the career and of the university in general is that saturate their students to the point of compromising the correct learning by excess of stress. Perhaps, the most remarkable thing is the teachers, who in general are great professionals, all with a lot of knowledge in their areas.


Malla curricular Antropología mención Arqueología

Comentarios

Publicar un comentario

Entradas populares de este blog

My top three :)

Mario Ojeda

The worst day ...